Jane Doe 77 v. Massac Unit School District #1 et al
| Jane Doe 77 |
| Darryl Bentson, Massac Unit School District #1, William Hatfield, Donald Smith and Reuben Bremer |
| 3:2012cv00268 |
| March 27, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| Massac |
| Michael J. Reagan |
| Donald G. Wilkerson |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
187
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams on 12/26/13. (amv)
|
|
Filing
180
ORDER denying 172 Motion to Quash. SNAP DIRECTED to provide the Court with documents responsive to the subpoeana by June 28, 2013 for in-camera review. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams on 6/26/2013. (anj)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER, GRANTING 31 MOTION for Protective Order filed by Jane Doe 77. Upon motion and over the objection of Defendants, Plaintiff is GRANTED leave to proceed through the pretrial phase of this case using the pseudonym "Jane Doe 77." This m atter is REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson for the purpose of fashioning a protective order. Within seven days of the date of this Order, Plaitiff shall file under seal her true identity so the Court and all attorneys can assess any conflicts of interest(action due by 5/17/2012). Signed by Judge Michael J. Reagan on 5/10/2012. (mmr, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
