United States of America v. Bacon

Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Robert A. Bacon
Case Number: 3:2012cv00295
Filed: April 6, 2012
Court: Illinois Southern District Court
Office: East St. Louis Office
County: Madison
Presiding Judge: David R. Herndon
Referring Judge: Donald G. Wilkerson
Nature of Suit: Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant)
Cause of Action: 26:7402
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
April 10, 2012 3 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER re 2 Petition to Enforce IRS Summons filed by United States of America ( Show Cause Hearing set for 5/24/2012 02:30 PM in East St. Louis Courthouse before Chief Judge David R. Herndon.). Signed by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 4/10/12. (klh, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. Bacon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: James M. Hipkiss
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Robert A. Bacon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.