Villa-Velasquez v. Godinez et al
| Mario Villa-Velasquez |
| S A Godinez, Donald Gaetz, Vipin Shah, Doctor Baker and Unknown Party |
| 3:2012cv00963 |
| August 31, 2012 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| Perry |
| G. Patrick Murphy |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
41
ORDER granting 38 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson on 1/30/2014. (jdp)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER re 24 Mail Returned, 25 Notice of Change of Address filed by Mario Villa-Velasquez. Plaintiff to comply with the November 27, 2013 Order by February 28, 2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson on 1/31/13. (sgp)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson, DENYING as moot 4 MOTION for Service of Process at Government Expense filed by Mario Villa-Velasquez, DENYING without prejudice 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Mario Villa-Velasqu ez. Defendants GODINEZ and GAETZ are DISMISSED from this action with prejudice. The Clerk of Court shall prepare for Defendants SHAH and BAKER: (1) Form 5 (Notice of a Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of a Summons), and (2) Form 6 (Waiver of Service of Summons). Donald G. Wilkerson added. Donald Gaetz and S A Godinez terminated. Signed by Judge G. Patrick Murphy on 10/9/2012. (beb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
