Staten v. Stith et al
| James E. Staten |
| Terrance Stith and Rudy McIntosh |
| 3:2012cv00972 |
| September 6, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| Adams |
| William D. Stiehl |
| Stephen C. Williams |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
5
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE; DENYING 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by James E. Staten. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment accordingly. The plaintiff is hereby BANNED from filing any paper with Un ited States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois, or its personnel, and BANNED from having others file papers on his behalf, with an exception for any criminal case in which Staten is a defendant and for any application for habeas cor pus that he may wish to file. The Clerk of the Court in this district is DIRECTED to RETURN UNFILED ALL PAPERS THAT PLAINTIFF ATTEMPTS TO FILE, EXCEPT PAPERS IN ANY CRIMINAL PROCEEDING IN WHICH LITIGANT MIGHT BE A DEFENDANT OR ANY HABEAS CORPUS APPLICATION HE MIGHT FILE. THE CLERK SHALL ALLOW PETITIONER TO FILE A MOTION TO MODIFY OR VACATE THIS ORDER ON OR AFTER FEBRUARY 20, 2015. Signed by Judge William D. Stiehl on 02/20/2013. (jst)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
