Ickes v. Patterson et al
Plaintiff: Kevin Ickes
Defendant: Marla Patterson, Robin Bryson, Estus Hood, Unknown Party and B Tolson
Case Number: 3:2012cv01087
Filed: October 11, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
Office: East St. Louis Office
County: Adams
Presiding Judge: G. Patrick Murphy
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 57 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, The Court ADOPTS the R & R (Doc. 56 ), GRANTS in part and DENIES in part defendants motions to dismiss (Docs. 36 , 41 & 51 ), and DISMISSES Count Three of plaintiff Kevin Ickes complaint.Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 3/6/2014. (jdh)
July 12, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER GRANTING 29 MOTION for Leave to File Amended Complaint filed by Kevin Ickes, 30 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer (in light of 29 Motion to Amend) filed by Robin Bryson, Marla Patterson. See order for specifics. Telephonic Status Conference set for 8/29/2013 at 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson on 7/12/13. (sgp)
February 27, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson. Defendant Tolson is DISMISSED from this action with prejudice. COUNT 2 is DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to complete, on Plaintiff's behalf, a summons and form USM-285 for service of process on Defendants PATTERSON, BRYSON, and HOOD; the Clerk shall issue the completed summons. Signed by Judge G. Patrick Murphy on 2/27/2013. (tjk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ickes v. Patterson et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kevin Ickes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Marla Patterson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Robin Bryson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Estus Hood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Party
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: B Tolson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?