Ickes v. Patterson et al
Kevin Ickes |
Marla Patterson, Robin Bryson, Estus Hood, Unknown Party and B Tolson |
3:2012cv01087 |
October 11, 2012 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
East St. Louis Office |
Adams |
G. Patrick Murphy |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 57 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, The Court ADOPTS the R & R (Doc. 56 ), GRANTS in part and DENIES in part defendants motions to dismiss (Docs. 36 , 41 & 51 ), and DISMISSES Count Three of plaintiff Kevin Ickes complaint.Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 3/6/2014. (jdh) |
Filing 33 ORDER GRANTING 29 MOTION for Leave to File Amended Complaint filed by Kevin Ickes, 30 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer (in light of 29 Motion to Amend) filed by Robin Bryson, Marla Patterson. See order for specifics. Telephonic Status Conference set for 8/29/2013 at 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson on 7/12/13. (sgp) |
Filing 10 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson. Defendant Tolson is DISMISSED from this action with prejudice. COUNT 2 is DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to complete, on Plaintiff's behalf, a summons and form USM-285 for service of process on Defendants PATTERSON, BRYSON, and HOOD; the Clerk shall issue the completed summons. Signed by Judge G. Patrick Murphy on 2/27/2013. (tjk) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.