Stuckey v. Mulch et al
| Ben Stuckey, III |
| Unknown Party and Roger Mulch |
| 3:2012cv01284 |
| December 19, 2012 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| Jefferson |
| Michael J. Reagan |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
10
ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice, for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. This dismissal shall count as one of Plaintiffs three allotted "strikes" under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Signed by Judge Michael J. Reagan on 3/8/2013. (tjk)
|
Filing
9
ORDER : Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. COUNT 1 (Deliberate Indifference to Medical Needs) is DISMISSED without prejudice. COUNT 2 of the complaint (Conditions of Confinement) i s DISMISSED with prejudice. Should Plaintiff wish to proceed on his deliberate indifference claim in COUNT 1, he shall file his First Amended Complaint, stating any facts which may exist to support a claim of deliberate indifference to his medical c ondition after his "second" injury, and naming the individual Defendants directly responsible for the alleged deprivations in Count 1, within 35 days of the entry of this order. The Clerk is DIRECTED to mail Plaintiff a blank civil rights complaint form. (Action due by 2/27/2013). Signed by Judge Michael J. Reagan on 1/22/2013. (tjk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.