Wright v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
| Marlene Wright |
| Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GMBH & Co. KG, Boehringer Ingelheim International GMBH and Bidachem S.P.A. |
| 3:2012cv60030 |
| August 24, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| David R. Herndon |
| Stephen C. Williams |
| Personal Injury- Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
23
CLERK'S JUDGMENT Closing Case and Dismissing with Prejudice approved by Judge David R. Herndon on 05/01/2015.(cjo)
|
|
Filing
19
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER NUMBER 25 (12-MD-2385 Doc. 113). Pursuant to CMO No. 25, 7 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim is WITHDRAWN. FURTHER, the following CLAIMS of the Plaintiff are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE: Manufacturing Defect, Supp ression of Evidence and Fraud, claims brought on behalf of Plaintiff on an individual basis, and any request for prejudgment interest. FURTHER, 10 Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint, filed 6/6/2012 is GRANTED, subject to dismissal of the claims listed above. Plaintiff is instructed to file amended complaint instanter. Signed by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 2/22/2013. (dsw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
