Fontana v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
| John Fontana, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim Fremont, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GMBH & Co., Boehringer Ingelheim International GMBH and Bidachem S.P.A. |
| 3:2012cv60084 |
| October 1, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| David R. Herndon |
| Stephen C. Williams |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
CLERK'S JUDGMENT DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE. Approved by Judge David R. Herndon on 02/02/2015.(jlrr )
|
|
Filing
8
CONSENT ORDER Dismissing Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Roxane, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, and/or Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation Without Prejudice. In the instant case, Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporat ion and Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation were voluntarily dismissed by the plaintiff and were terminated from the action on November 20, 2012. Nonetheless, the terms consented to in this order shall apply to the November 20, 2012 dismissals of Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation.Signed by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 12/7/2012. (dsw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
