Maxum Indemnity Company v. Miller Contracting Services, Inc. et al
| Maxum Indemnity Company |
| Sarah Oller, Miller Contracting Services, Inc. and Darrell Oller |
| 3:2013cv00179 |
| February 21, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Philip M. Frazier |
| David R. Herndon |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
CLERK'S JUDGMENT in favor of Maxum Indemnity Company against Miller Contracting Services, Inc.. Approved by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 6/6/2014. (cekf)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice, granting 24 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Maxum Indemnity Company, denying 25 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Miller Contracting Services, Inc., and denying 27 MOT ION for Hearing re 25 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment , 24 MOTION for Summary Judgment and Oral Argument filed by Miller Contracting Services, Inc. Judgment shall enter accordingly. Signed by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 6/3/2014. (mtm)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER re 19 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Maxum Indemnity Company. The Court acknowledges the voluntary dismissal of the Ollers from this action without prejudice. Darrell Oller and Sarah Oller terminated. Signed by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 6/13/2013. (mtm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
