Godfrey v. Harrington et al
| Toby Godfrey |
| Richard Harrington, Unknown Party, Sergeant Heiman and Sergeant Eladvor |
| 3:2013cv00280 |
| March 20, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| Randolph |
| G. Patrick Murphy |
| Donald G. Wilkerson |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
197
ORDER DENYING 185 Motion for TRO. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson on 3/29/17. (sgp)
|
|
Filing
156
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, The Court ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (Doc. 153 ); and DENIES Moldenhauer's motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution (Doc. 147 ). Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 9/21/2016. (jdh)
|
|
Filing
126
ORDER GRANTING 110 Report and Recommendations and DENYING Defendant's motion for summary judgment 101 . Signed by Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 12/14/15. (ceg)
|
|
Filing
91
ORDER ADOPTING 78 Report and Recommendations and DENYING 63 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 3/16/15. (klh2)
|
|
Filing
86
ORDER DENYING 81 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; GRANTING 82 Motion to Amend/Correct; DENYING 84 Motion ; DENYING 85 Motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson on 2/9/15. (sgp)
|
|
Filing
50
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, The Court hereby ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (Doc. 31 );DENIES Godfreys motion for a TRO and PI with prejudice in part and without prejudice in part (Doc. 24 ). The motion is denied with prejudice to the extent it seeks a TRO and without prejudice to the extent it seeks a PI; and DENIES Godfreys motion for default judgment (Doc. 29 ). Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 12/13/2013. (jdh)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER re 4 Order Directing Prisoner Payment and initial filing fee. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson on 11/5/13. (sgp)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE 18 Motion to Amend/Correct; DENYING 19 Motion for Recruitment of Counsel ; DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE 20 Motion to Produce; DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE 21 Motion to Amend/Correct; DENYING 22 Motion ; DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE 23 Motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson on 9/12/13. (sgp)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson, Granting 8 MOTION to Amend/Correct filed by Toby Godfrey, Denying 11 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Toby Godfrey. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to prepare for De fendants RICHARD HARRINGTON, SERGEANT HEIMAN and SERGEANT ELADVOR: (1) Form 5 (Notice of a Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of a Summons), and (2) Form 6 (Waiver of Service of Summons). See attached order for further details. Signed by Judge G. Patrick Murphy on 5/31/2013. (tjk)
|
|
Filing
6
IT IS ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice, and with leave to amend. Defendants S.A. GODINEZ, RICHARD HARRINGTON, KIMBERLY BUTLER and GAIL WALLS are DISMISSED from this action without prejudice. Plaintiff is ADVISED that this dis missal shall not count as one of his allotted "strikes" under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, should Plaintiff wish to proceed, he shall file his First Amended Complaint, within 30 days of the entry of this order. Failure to timely file an amended complaint shall result in the dismissal of the action becoming dismissal with prejudice. (Action due by 5/13/2013). Signed by Judge G. Patrick Murphy on 4/11/2013. (tjk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
