Davis v. Watson et al
Sydney Davis |
Rick Watson, Mearl Justus, John Doe(s), Richard Roe, Jane Doe and St. Clair County |
3:2013cv00740 |
July 24, 2013 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
East St. Louis Office |
St. Clair |
Philip M. Frazier |
J. Phil Gilbert |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 60 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, The Court DISMISSES all claims against defendants John Doe, Richard Roe, Jane Doe, unknown Police Officers, unknown Security Guards, unknown Nurses, and unknown Doctors without prejudice for failure to serve and DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to enter judgment accordingly at the close of the case. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 6/22/2015. (jdh) |
Filing 39 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, The Court ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (Doc. 33 );DENIES the motion to dismiss filed by defendant St. Clair County, Sheriff Rick Watson and Philip McLaurin (Doc. 8 ); GRANTS the motion to dismiss filed by defendants Wexfo rd Health Sources, Inc. and Vipin Shah (Doc. 26 ); DISMISSES Counts 6 and 8 of the Amended Complaint without prejudice and with leave to replead; and ORDERS that plaintiff Sydney Davis shall have up to and including July 18, 2014, to file an amended pleading with the required affidavit. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 6/24/2014. (jdh) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.