McCutcheon v. Schnicker et al
| John McCutcheon |
| Michael Schnicker, C/O Bethel, Lieutenant Payne, Misty Price, Betsy Spiller, Kimberly Butler and Ben Haynes |
| 3:2013cv00779 |
| July 31, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| Randolph |
| J. Phil Gilbert |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
106
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 99 ) in its entirety and DENIES Defendants Steve Bethel, Benjamin Haynes, and Michael Schnicker's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 75 ). Plaintiff's Motion for Writ of Habeas Corpus ad testificandum (Doc. 97 ) is DENIED as premature. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 3/17/2016. (jdh)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Philip M. Frazier, granting 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by John McCutcheon. Defendants PAYNE, PRICE, SPILLER, and BUTLER are DISMISSED from this action without prejudice. The C lerk of Court shall prepare for Defendants SCHNICKER, BETHEL, and HAYNES: (1) Form 5 (Notice of a Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of a Summons), and (2) Form 6 (Waiver of Service of Summons). The Clerk of Court is directed to send a copy of this Order to Plaintiff and to the Trust Fund Officer at Menard. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 9/6/2013. (tjk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
