Smith v. Harrington et al
| Jimmie Smith |
| Rick Harrington, Chief Administrative Officers, Betsy Spiller, Cowan, Internal Affairs, Administrative Review Board and S A Godinez |
| 3:2013cv00900 |
| August 29, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| Randolph |
| Michael J. Reagan |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
171
JUDGMENT in favor of Administrative Review Board, Chief Administrative Officers, Internal Affairs, Rick Harrington, S A Godinez against Jimmie Smith all other remaining claims are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams on 10/16/2017. (amv)
|
|
Filing
81
ORDER. Plaintiff's most recent motion to disqualify (Doc. 80 ) is DENIED. Plaintiff is warned that further redundant motions may necessitate the Court to exercise its inherent power to ensure that frivolous, vexatious, and repeated filings do not interfere with the orderly administration of justice by diverting scarce judicial resources. See attached for details. Signed by Judge Michael J. Reagan on 8/14/2014. (jls)
|
|
Filing
79
Plaintiff's Motion to "Remove" (properly understood as a motion to disqualify) the District Judge (Doc. 76 ) is DENIED. See attached for details. Signed by Judge Michael J. Reagan on 8/1/2014. (jls)
|
|
Filing
73
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; For the reasons explained in the attached Memorandum & Order, the undersigned ADOPTS in full (Doc. 59 ) Judge Williams' Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's Motions for Injunctive Relief (Doc. 8 , Doc. 11 , Doc. 16 , Doc. 31 , and Doc. 38 ) are DENIED. Likewise, Plaintiff's Motion to Reconsider the denial of leave to amend his complaint (Doc. 63 ) is DENIED, and his motion for recruitment of counsel (Doc. 63 ) is DENIED without prejudice. Signed by Judge Michael J. Reagan on 07/17/2014. (dkd)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams, Granting 17 MOTION EMERGENCY filed by Jimmie Smith. COUNT 2 is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Defendants CHIEF ADMINISTR ATIVE OFFICERS and INTERNAL AFFAIRS are DISMISSED from this action with prejudice. Plaintiff's emergency motions for injunctive relief (Doc. 8, 11, and 16) are hereby REFERRED to United States Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams for an evident iary hearing and issuance of a report and recommendation. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to complete, on Plaintiff's behalf, a summons and form USM-285 for service of process on Defendants HARRINGTON, SPILLER, COWAN, ANDERSON, and GODINEZ. Signed by Judge Michael J. Reagan on 10/22/2013. (tjk)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER denying 1 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Jimmie Smith. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within 35 days of the date of this order Plaintiff shall file a complaint, thereby properly initiating an action. If Plaintiff still seeks in junctive relief, he must file a new motion. Failure to file a proper complaint by the prescribed deadline will result in the dismissal of this action for lack of subject matterjurisdiction; such a dismissal shall count as one of his allotted "strikes" under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). (Action due by 9/30/2013., Amended Pleadings due by 10/16/2013). Signed by Judge Michael J. Reagan on 9/11/2013. (tjk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
