Edwards v. U.S. Parole Commission
Petitioner: George H Edwards, Jr
Respondent: U.S. Parole Commission
Case Number: 3:2013cv00934
Filed: September 10, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
Office: East St. Louis Office
County: Bond
Presiding Judge: Philip M. Frazier
Presiding Judge: David R. Herndon
Nature of Suit: Mandamus and Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 37 CLERK'S JUDGMENT dismissing case with prejudice. Approved by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 5/21/14. (cekf)
April 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER denying 26 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 04/30/2014. (kbl)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Edwards v. U.S. Parole Commission
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: U.S. Parole Commission
Represented By: J. Christopher Moore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: George H Edwards, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?