Montana v. Wilborn et al
| Shahid Ahmad Montana, Jr |
| Jill Stevens, Unknown Party, Eric Holern, Tracy Lambert, Mary Rollins, Kattie Lingle Clover, Cheryl Bellcouch, Dr Chandra, Kristin Terry Hammerslay, Kelly Rhodes and George Wilborn |
| 3:2013cv00967 |
| September 19, 2013 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| Livingston |
| Michael J. Reagan |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
11
ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice for failure to comply with a Court order. This dismissal shall NOT count as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Signed by Judge Michael J. Reagan on 11/19/2013. (tjk)
|
Filing
9
ORDER denying 5 MOTION to Copy MOTION to Amend/Correct MOTION to Enforce MOTION Have mail opened in front of plaintiff filed by Shahid Ahmad Montana, Jr, 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Shahid Ahmad Montana, Jr, and 8 MOTION for Hearing MOTION to Compel filed by Shahid Ahmad Montana, Jr. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff shall pay the full filing fee of $400.00 for this action within twenty-one (21) days of the date of entry of this Order. If Plaintiff fails to comply with this Order in the time allotted by the Court, this case will be dismissed. (Action due by 11/5/2013). Signed by Judge Michael J. Reagan on 10/15/2013. (tjk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.