Gregory v. Chamness et al
| Johnny Brett Gregory |
| Tony Chamness, Jeff Baney, Weasel Bradley, Wendy J Roal, Amber L Nelson, Harrell Watts and Harley Lappin |
| 3:2013cv01124 |
| October 31, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Michael J. Reagan |
| Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
100
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Johnny Brett Gregory is SANCTIONED with a $500 fine, to be paid before any other civil litigation will be filed. This fine is in addition to any other filing fees owed to this District. The Court will not accept bond s or liens as payment of this sanction; Plaintiff must use a method of payment currently accepted by the Clerk's Office. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to return all civil pleadings unfiled until the sanction is paid. This filing restriction do es not extend to a Notice of Appeal from this Order (which shall result in the imposition of an additional $505.00 filing/docketing fee), to the filing of any Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, or to pleadings filed as a defendant in another criminal or civil case. In accordance with this precedent, Plaintiff may seek modification or rescission of this Order, by filing a motion in this Court no earlier than two years from the date of entry of this Order, assuming that he fails to pay the balance of his filing fees within that 2-year time period. Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan on 12/21/2017. (tjk)
|
|
Filing
73
ORDER: Plaintiffs Motions are DENIED. (Doc. 71) (Doc. 72). Plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSE why he should not be sanctioned with a monetary fine and a filing ban for filing frivolous litigation. Plaintiff shall show cause no later than August 23, 2017 (21 days from the date of this order). ( Show Cause Response due by 8/23/2017.). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan on 8/2/2017. (tkm)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER DISMISSING Second Amended Complaint 32 and Case without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction, and DENYING all pending motions [33-36] as Moot. Judgment shall enter accordingly. Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan on 11/17/2014. (mmr)
|
|
Filing
31
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the amended complaint (Doc. 15 ) is DISMISSED without prejudice. On or before June 2, 2014, Plaintiff shall file a second amended complaint, which shall then be subject to review pursuant to Section 1915A. If the amended complaint still fails to state a claim, or if Plaintiff does not submit an amended complaint, the dismissal of the amended complaint and this action shall become a dismissal with prejudice and judgment shall be entered accordingly, closing this case. (Amended Pleadings due by 6/2/2014). Signed by Judge Michael J. Reagan on 5/14/2014. (tjk)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER denying 9 MOTION for Bond filed by Johnny Brett Gregory, 6 MOTION Request to Deem This Case "Complex" re 5 Objection filed by Johnny Brett Gregory. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that COUNTS 1 and 6 are DISMISSED with prejudic e. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that COUNTS 2, 3, 4, and 5 are DISMISSED without prejudice and with leave to amend. On or before December 27, 2013, Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint stating a colorable constitutional claim, or this action will be dismissed with prejudice. (Amended Pleadings due by 12/27/2013) FloridaUCC Inc terminated. Signed by Judge Michael J. Reagan on 12/2/2013. (tjk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
