Jones v. Madison County Jail
| Joshua Jared Jones |
| Donald Bunt and Bobbie Unfried |
| 3:2013cv01164 |
| November 12, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| Madison |
| J. Phil Gilbert |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Covil Procedure 25(a)(1). Signed by Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 5/12/15. (klh2)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 1/29/2014. (tjk)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER: The complaint (Doc. 1 ) is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Defendant MADISON COUNTY JAIL is DISMISSED from this action with prejudice. Defendant MADISON COUNTY JAIL MEDICAL STAFF a re DISMISSED from this action without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, should he wish to proceed with this case, Plaintiff shall file his First Amended Complaint within 35 days of the entry of this order. Failure to file an amended complaint that conforms with this Order shall result in the dismissal of this action with prejudice. (Amended Pleadings due by 12/23/2013). Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 11/18/2013. (tjk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
