Smith v. Butler et al
| Allory Smith |
| Kathy Butler, Kala Sems, Matt Payne, Rhonna Medlin, Laura Qualls, Wanda Evans, Cheyl Couch, Dr Shicker, Marvin Powers, Wendy Blank, Mr Smith, Ms Ramsey, Chad Perrish, Terri Anderson and Dr Van |
| 3:2013cv01215 |
| November 22, 2013 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| Livingston |
| Michael J. Reagan |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
187
JUDGMENT in favor of Chad Perrish, Cheyl Couch, Dr Shicker, Jagannathan Srinivasaraghavan, Kala Sims Robinson, Kathy Butler Lovies, Laura Qualls, Marvin Powers, Matt Payne, Mr Smith, Ms Ramsey, Rhonna Medlin, Terri Anderson, Wanda Evans, Wendy Blank against Allory Smith. All remaining issues are dismissed with prejudice and without costs. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams on 11/7/16. (amv)
|
|
Filing
115
MEMORANDUM & ORDER. For the reasons explained herein, (1) Defendants Qualls, Evans, Medlin, Anderson, Blank, Perrish, Ramsey, Smith, and Shicker are dismissed without prejudice; (2) Defendant Sims Robinson's summary judgment motio n (Doc. 83 ) is GRANTED IN PART; (3) Defendant Couch's summary judgment motion (Doc. 88 ) is GRANTED IN PART; (4) Defendant Srinivasaraghavan's summary judgment motion (Doc. 105 ) is GRANTED. See attached for details. Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan on 1/5/2015. (jls)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
