Bentz v. Hughs et al
David Robert Bentz |
Robert Hughs, Ziglier, Sergeant Dunn, Sergeant Shurzt, Rick Harrington, Susan Hill, C/O Lindenberg, M A Miner, C/O Davis, E Quand, J Berdner, C/O Steve and Unknown Party |
3:2013cv01280 |
December 12, 2013 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
East St. Louis Office |
Randolph |
Michael J. Reagan |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 210 ORDER: The motion for new trial filed by Plaintiff David Robert Bentz pursuant to Rule 59 and Rule 50 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Doc. 186 ) is DENIED. Plaintiff's Motion for Status (Doc. 209 ) is DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 11/6/2017. (mlp) |
Filing 154 CERTIFICATION OF READINESS FOR TRIAL. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson on 1/12/17. (sgp) |
Filing 110 ORDER. Plaintiff's motions for injunctive relief are DENIED 70 73 . The Court adopts the Reports and Recommendations on these matters 72 98 . Signed by Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 1/11/2016. (ceg) |
Filing 26 ORDER DENYING WITH PREJUDICE 23 Motion for Leave to File; DENYING WITH PREJUDICE 24 Motion to Supplement;DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE 25 Motion for issuance of summons. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson on 3/3/14. (sgp) |
Filing 9 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson. Signed by Judge Michael J. Reagan on 1/13/2014. (tjk) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.