Sandoval v. Director of the Illinois Department of Corrections et al
Joel Sandoval, Jr |
Director of the Illinois Department of Corrections, William G Lacy and Dennis Dernbach |
3:2013cv01295 |
December 16, 2013 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
East St. Louis Office |
Lawrence |
Michael J. Reagan |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 30 ORDER granting 26 Motion for Summary Judgment: For the reasons thoroughly explained in the attached Memorandum and Order, the Court GRANTS Defendant's motion for summary judgment (based on failure to exhaust administrative remedies prior to filing suit) and DISMISSES this case without prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan on 10/28/15. (soh ) |
Filing 20 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams. Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan on 11/21/2014. (tjk) |
Filing 8 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Sandoval's complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that on or before February 12, 2014, Plaintiff Sandoval shall file and amended complaint consistent with this Order. Failure to file the amended complaint will result in the entry of final judgment and this case will be closed. (Amended Pleadings due by 2/12/2014). Signed by Judge Michael J. Reagan on 1/13/2014. (tjk) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.