Johnson v. Dauber et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|August 5, 2015
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff Lennil L. Johnson is hereby RESTRICTED from filing any new civil actions in this Court until such time as his outstanding filing fees of $2,418.76 have been paid in full. This filing restriction does not extend t o a notice of appeal from this order (which shall result in the imposition of an additional $505.00 filing/docketing fee), to the filing of any petition for a writ of habeas corpus, nor to pleadings filed as a defendant in another criminal or ci vil case. Should Plaintiff attempt to file any new civil action in this Court, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to return any documents submitted in violation of this order to the Plaintiff unfiled. Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan on 8/5/2015. (tjk)
|March 3, 2014
ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, denying 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Lennil L Johnson. Plaintiff is ADVISED that this dismissal shall count as anothe r strike under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Plaintiff is FURTHER ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why this Court should not restrict him from filing any further actions in this Court until such time as Plaintiff pays the outstanding $2,018.76 owed for his previously filed actions in full, in addition to the $400.00 filing fee for this action. (Action due by 4/7/2014). Signed by Judge Michael J. Reagan on 3/3/2014. (tjk)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?