King v. Gaetz et al
| Marshall King |
| C/O Lawrence and C/O Harris |
| 3:2014cv00532 |
| May 9, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| Perry |
| Michael J. Reagan |
| Stephen C. Williams |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
92
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 86 Motion for Summary Judgment: For the reasons explained in the attached Order, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendants' summary judgment motion (Doc. 86). The motion is denie d as to Plaintiff's conditions of confinement claim against Defendant Lawrence based on Plaintiff's allegedly filthy cell (toilet/sink/walls not insects and dusty air vents). The motion is granted in all other respects. See Order for detai ls. (This Order resolves all claims against Defendant Harris. Clerk of Court to enter judgment in favor of Harris and against Plaintiff at close of the case.) Final pretrial conference and trial to proceed as scheduled as to Defendant Lawrence. Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan on 8/11/16. (soh)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams and Granting, in part, Denying, in part 4 Motion for Service of Process at Government Expense filed by Marshall King. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Michael J. Reagan on 6/5/14. (jsy)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
