Duncan v. Quin et al
| Darryl R. Duncan |
| Dana M. Tylka, Dee Dee Brookhart, Randy Grounds, C. Ruffin, J. Pate, Administrative Review Board, Prisoner Review Board, S.A. Godinez, Pat Quin, M. Littlejohn, Resec, Victor Ohl and Wampler |
| 3:2014cv00604 |
| May 27, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| Crawford |
| J. Phil Gilbert |
| Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6
ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice. Plaintiff is ADVISED that this dismissal shall count as a "strike" under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Further, because two of Plaintiff's previously-filed lawsuits have also been dismissed pursuant to § 1915A for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, the dismissal of this case gives Plaintiff his third "strike." If Plaintiff seeks to file any future civil action while he is a prisoner, he will no longer be eligible to pay a filing fee in installments using the in forma pauperis provisions of § 1915(a) and (b), unless he can establish that he is "under imminent danger of serious physical injury." 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). ORDER DENYING 2 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order filed by Darryl R. Duncan and DENYING as MOOT 4 Motion to Appoint Counsel filed by Darryl R. Duncan. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 6/3/14. (jsy)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
