Clark v. Bunt et al
| Mark A Clark |
| Madison County Jail, Robert Hertz and Donald Bunt |
| 3:2014cv00632 |
| June 3, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| Madison |
| Nancy J. Rosenstengel |
| Donald G. Wilkerson |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
ORDER GRANTING 33 MOTION for Recruitment of Counsel filed by Mark A Clark, GRANTING 28 MOTION for Recruitment of Counsel filed by Mark A Clark. Telephonic Status Conference set for 2/11/2015 at 1:30 PM before Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilke rson. Attorneys James J Boland and Julian Wierenga for Mark A Clark added. Attorney Wierenga is directed to take steps to be admitted to practice in this Court as provided by Local Rule 83.1. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson on 12/11/14. (sgp)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER DENYING 27 Motion to Amend/Correct; TAKING UNDER ADVISEMENT 28 Motion for Recruitment of Counsel ; GRANTING 29 Motion ; GRANTING 30 Motion for Extension of Time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson on 11/20/14. (sgp)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE 4 Motion for Recruitment of Counsel; DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE 7 Motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson on 7/9/14. (sgp)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson. Signed by Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 6/25/2014. (tjk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
