Williams v. Harrington et al
| Theopolis Williams |
| Rick Harrington, Gail Walls, Kimberly Butler, Dr Shearing, Amy Lang, Lt. Cartwright, Lori Oakley, Sue Hill, Mr Troust and Unknown Party |
| 3:2014cv00660 |
| June 9, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| Perry |
| J. Phil Gilbert |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
74
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, the Court ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (Doc. 70 ); and DENIES Williams' motion for a preliminary injunction (Doc. 68 ). Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 2/17/2016. (jdh)
|
|
Filing
62
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, The Court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to transfer motion (Doc. 60 ) to the Court of Appeals for consideration in connection with Appeal No. 15-2100. The Court DENIES motion (Doc. 61 without prejudice. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 7/21/2015. (jdh)
|
|
Filing
51
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, The Court AFFIRMS Magistrate Judge Fraziers December 2, 2014, order (Doc. 49 ) and OVERRULES Williams objections (Doc. 50 ). Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 5/7/2015. (jdh)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Philip M. Frazier, denying 4 MOTION for Service of Process at Government Expense filed by Theopolis Williams. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 7/14/2014. (tjk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
