Duncan v. Quinn et al
| Darryl R Duncan |
| Thomas Spiller, Edwards and Christine Brown |
| 3:2014cv01167 |
| October 28, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| Perry |
| Michael J. Reagan |
| Stephen C. Williams |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
130
ORDER: For the reasons stated herein, the Court agrees with the conclusions reached by Magistrate Judge Williams. Therefore, the Court REJECTS Plaintiffs objections (Doc. 123) and ADOPTS the Report and Recommendations in its entirety (Doc. 118). The Court REVOKES the Plaintiffs IFP status and ORDERS the Plaintiff to pay the full filing fee within thirty (30) days of the entry of this Order. Failure to pay the full filing fee will result in a dismissal of this action. The Court also DENIES Plaintiffs latest request for IFP status (Doc. 124). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan on 1/6/16. (mea)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams, granting in part and denying in part 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Darryl R Duncan. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order is DENIED in all respects. Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan on 10/31/2014. (tjk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
