Staszak v. USA

Staszak v. USA

Plaintiff:	Matthew L Staszak
Defendant:	USA
Case Number:	3:2015cv00812
Filed:	July 27, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
Office:	East St. Louis Office
County:	XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge:	Michael J. Reagan
Presiding Judge:	Stephen C. Williams
Nature of Suit:	Prison Condition
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 9, 2017	Filing 75 ORDER denying 56 Motion in Limine; granting in part and denying in part 57 Motion in Limine. The nature of the Plaintiff's prior conviction shall not be admissible at trial, thus Plaintiff's first motion in limine is GRANTED and the Government's is DENIED. All other concerns raised by the parties appear to have been largely resolved by their responses to each other's motions. Thus, the Government's motions 2-4 and the Plaintiff's second motion are DENIED as moot. Appropriate objections may be made at trial.. Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan on 11/9/2017. (kgk)
October 31, 2017	Filing 64 ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum and Order, the Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART Defendant's partial motion for summary judgment. The Court GRANTS summary judgment as to the claim involving Robert son but DENIES summary judgment as to the claim involving Castleman. The only claims which remain in this case are Plaintiff's claim regarding the force used by Meadows and Plaintiff's claim regarding Castleman's failure to intervene. Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan on 10/31/2017. (rah)

Date Filed

Document Text

November 9, 2017

Filing 75 ORDER denying 56 Motion in Limine; granting in part and denying in part 57 Motion in Limine. The nature of the Plaintiff's prior conviction shall not be admissible at trial, thus Plaintiff's first motion in limine is GRANTED and the Government's is DENIED. All other concerns raised by the parties appear to have been largely resolved by their responses to each other's motions. Thus, the Government's motions 2-4 and the Plaintiff's second motion are DENIED as moot. Appropriate objections may be made at trial.. Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan on 11/9/2017. (kgk)

October 31, 2017

Filing 64 ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum and Order, the Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART Defendant's partial motion for summary judgment. The Court GRANTS summary judgment as to the claim involving Robert son but DENIES summary judgment as to the claim involving Castleman. The only claims which remain in this case are Plaintiff's claim regarding the force used by Meadows and Plaintiff's claim regarding Castleman's failure to intervene. Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan on 10/31/2017. (rah)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Staszak v. USA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Matthew L Staszak
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: USA
Represented By:	Jamie Goss Dempsey
Represented By:	Nathan E. Wyatt
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?