USA v. Pfeifer
Petitioner: USA
Respondent: Jeffrey J. Pfeifer
Case Number: 3:2015cv01230
Filed: November 6, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
Office: East St. Louis Office
County: Madison
Presiding Judge: David R. Herndon
Presiding Judge: Donald G. Wilkerson
Nature of Suit: Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant)
Cause of Action: 26 U.S.C. ยง 7402
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 27, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER granting 21 Motion Postpone Execution of Arrest Warrant. Signed by Judge David R. Herndon on 6/27/2016. (dsw)
June 15, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 20 SECOND ORDER re 13 MOTION for Contempt or in the Alternative to Show Cause why Respondent Should not be Held in Civil Contempt and Memorandum in Support filed by USA. The Court hereby reissues its prior Order finding Respondent in civil contempt. The Court orders issuance of a warrant for Respondents arrest. The arrest warrant will be executed unless by the end of business on June 27, 2016 (5:00 p.m.), Respondent provides the documents, records, and data required by the IRS summons and described in the attached order. The United States Marshal is DIRECTED, to serve a copy of this order on respondent. Signed by Judge David R. Herndon on 6/15/2016. (dsw)
June 2, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER RE: 13 MOTION for Contempt or in the Alternative to Show Cause why Respondent Should not be Held in Civil Contempt and Memorandum in Support filed by USA. The Court finds Respondent in civil contempt and orders issuance of a warra nt for Respondents arrest. The arrest warrant will be executed unless by the end of business on June 13, 2016 (5:00 p.m.), Respondent provides the documents, records, and data required by the IRS summons and described in the attached order. Signed by Judge David R. Herndon on 6/2/2016. (dsw)
May 5, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Respondent, Jeffrey J. Pfeiffer, shall appear in person before the United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois in East St. Louis, Illinois, on Thursday, June 2, 2016 at 10:00 a.m. to show cause why he shoul d not be held in contempt for failure to obey the order to appear at the April 14, 2016 hearing and for failure to obey the Courts order issued on April 18, 2016 directing the respondent to comply with the IRS summons. The United States of America is DIRECTED to provide a copy of this Order to the respondent, at his last known address, via certified mail, and to file proof thereof, on or before, Thursday, May 19, 2016. Signed by Judge David R. Herndon on 5/5/2016. (dsw)
April 18, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER Requiring the Production of Documents. Signed by Judge David R. Herndon on 4/18/2016. (dsw)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: USA v. Pfeifer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: USA
Represented By: Nicholas J Biersbach
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Jeffrey J. Pfeifer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?