Ditterline et al v. Mounds Police Department et al
| Delana D. Ditterline, Terry L. Ditterline, Bryan A. Ditterline and Brandon A. Ditterline |
| Mounds Police Department, Kitisha N. Ray, Dustin Turska, Lyle Womack, Martin Ethridge, Kent Ray, Lloyd Bosecker and Pulaski County Sherriff's Dept |
| 3:2015cv01287 |
| November 19, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| Pulaski |
| Michael J. Reagan |
| Stephen C. Williams |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
98
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, denying 91 MOTION for New Trial Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59 filed by Dustin Turska and 90 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law pursuant to FRCP 50(b) filed by Dustin Turska. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 5/29/2018. (jdh)
|
|
Filing
77
CLERK'S JUDGMENT. Approved by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 3/7/2018. (jdh)
|
|
Filing
54
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, The Court GRANTS the defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. 51 ) in relation to defendant Lloyd Bosecker ONLY and DENIES the defendants' motion for summary judgment in relation to the other remaining defendants. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to terminate defendant Lloyd Bosecker and enter judgment in favor of him at the conclusion of this case. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 12/7/2017. (jdh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
