Curtis v. Stein Steel Mill Services, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Marshall Curtis
Defendant: Stein Steel Mill Services, Inc., Alan Medford and Dennis Beasly
Case Number: 3:2016cv00139
Filed: February 5, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
Office: East St. Louis Office
County: Madison
Presiding Judge: J. Phil Gilbert
Presiding Judge: Stephen C. Williams
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 1, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 54 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to tax the Bill of Cost pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d). Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 8/1/2017. (jdh)
June 20, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 49 CLERK'S JUDGMENT in favor of Stein Steel Mill Services, Inc., Alan Medford, Dennis Beasly against Marshall Curtis. Approved by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 6/20/2017. (jdh)
June 29, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 35 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, plaintiff's Motion (Doc. 28 ) for Leave to Amended is DENIED as the proposed third amended complaint is futile as it would not survive a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. The Court finds Plaintiffs Third Motion to Remand (Doc. 29 ) moot. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 6/29/2016. (jdh)
May 26, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 27 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, denying 26 Second MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Marshall Curtis. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 5/26/2016. (jdh)
May 11, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 25 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, Plaintiff's reply brief (Doc. 24) is STRICKEN for failure to comply with Local Rule 7.1. Defendants Medford and Beasley are DISMISSED without prejudice and Plaintiff's First Motion for Remand (Doc. 15 ) and Plaintiff's Motion to Amend (Doc. 17 ) are DENIED without prejudice. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 5/11/2016. (jdh)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Curtis v. Stein Steel Mill Services, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marshall Curtis
Represented By: Randall P. Steele
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stein Steel Mill Services, Inc.
Represented By: Dean L. Franklin
Represented By: Krissa P. Lubben
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alan Medford
Represented By: Dean L. Franklin
Represented By: Krissa P. Lubben
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dennis Beasly
Represented By: Dean L. Franklin
Represented By: Krissa P. Lubben
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?