Farris v. Kurr, et al
Plaintiff: Kenneth B. Farris, Jr.
Defendant: Mrs. Kurr, Mrs. Carpenter and John Does
Case Number: 3:2016cv00272
Filed: March 15, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
Office: East St. Louis Office
County: Cook
Presiding Judge: Staci M. Yandle
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 169 ORDER DENYING 153 MOTION to Allow Plaintiff to be Present in Person for Trial filed by Kenneth B. Farris, Jr. Counsel for Plaintiff shall notify the Court by May 1, 2020 as to where Plaintiff is currently located. Signed by Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly on 3/23/2020. (nmf)
September 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 159 ORDER TAKING UNDER ADVISEMENT 124 MOTION in Limine To Bar Testimony Disputing That Plaintiff Did Not Have an ADA Attendant Motion No. 1 filed by Kenneth B. Farris, Jr.; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 125 MOTION in Limine to Bar Testimony or Evidence of Plaintiff's Criminal History - Motion No. 2 filed by Kenneth B. Farris, Jr.; GRANTING IN PART, DENYING IN PART, and TAKING UNDER ADVISEMENT IN PART 131 MOTION in Limine filed by Heather Carpenter Wampler; and GRANTING IN PART, DENYING IN PART, and TAKING UNDER ADVISEMENT IN PART 132 MOTION in Limine filed by Illinois Dept. of Corrections, Susan Kurr. Signed by Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly on 9/16/2019. (nmf)
June 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 115 ORDER - The Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Wampler and Wexford (Doc. 93 ) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Kerr, Grounds, Martin, and the IDOC (Doc. 98 ) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Plaintiff against the IDOC Defendants (Doc. 99 ) is DENIED, and the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Plaintiff against the Wexford Defendants [Doc. 101 ) is DENIED. Signed by Judge Staci M. Yandle on 6/19/2018. (njh)
June 21, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Philip M. Frazier. Signed by Judge Staci M. Yandle on 6/21/2016. (tjk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Farris v. Kurr, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kenneth B. Farris, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mrs. Kurr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mrs. Carpenter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Does
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?