Black v. Brown et al
Rodney Eugene Black |
Keith Brown and Jill Moore |
3:2016cv00325 |
March 25, 2016 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
East St. Louis Office |
Saline |
Michael J. Reagan |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 101 ORDER REJECTING Report and Recommendation (Doc. 96 ): Defendant Dan Williams' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 88 ) is GRANTED and Plaintiff's claims against Williams are DISMISSED with prejudice. Plaintiff shall proceed against the remaining defendants on his Fourteenth Amendment deliberate indifference claim. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enterjudgment accordingly at the close of this case. Signed by Judge Staci M. Yandle on 10/31/2019. (mah) |
Filing 100 ORDER ADOPTING Report and Recommendation (Doc. 91 ): Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Pleadings (Doc. 75 ) is DENIED. Signed by Judge Staci M. Yandle on 7/24/2019. (mah) |
Filing 11 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams.(tjk) |
Filing 8 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's complaint (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in order to proceed with this action, Plaintiff is DIRECTED to submit his First Amended Complaint within 35 days of the entry of this order. (Amended Pleadings due by 5/23/2016). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan on 4/18/2016. (tjk) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.