Justi v. Wexford Health Services et al
| Patrick Justi |
| Wexford Health Services, Vipin Shah, Dr Butalid, Michael Adams and Kurt Osmundson |
| 3:2016cv00396 |
| April 11, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| Morgan |
| J. Phil Gilbert |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
77
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, The Court ADOPTS the Report as SUPPLEMENTED by this order (Doc. 70), OVERRULES Justi's objection (Doc. 75), GRANTS Shah's motion for summary judgment (Doc. 58) AND DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 7/19/2018. (tag)
|
|
Filing
56
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, The Court ADOPTS the conclusions in the Report as MODIFIED by the reasoning stated in this order (Doc. 53 ); GRANTS the motion for summary judgment filed by defendants Butalid, Adams and Osmundson (Doc. 48); DISMISSES Coun ts 2, 3 and 4 against defendants Adams, Butalid and Osmundson without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. The Court directs the Clerk of Court to enter judgment accordingly at the close of close of the case. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 7/18/2017. (jdh)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 8/18/2016. (tjk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
