Tolbert v. Foster et al
| James Tolbert |
| Craig Foster and C/O Slagle |
| 3:2016cv00429 |
| April 18, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| Fayette |
| Michael J. Reagan |
| Stephen C. Williams |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
ORDER denying 36 Motion for Reconsideration: As explained in the attached Order, Plaintiff Tolbert has identified no manifest error of law or fact (and presented no newly discovered evidence) which would support vacating the Court's dismissal order 32 and accompanying judgment. The motion to reconsider/vacate/reopen (Doc. 36) is DENIED.Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan on 3/15/18. (soh)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The Court ADOPTS Judge Williams' Report and Recommendation (Doc. 30 ) in its entirety and GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Defendant's motion for sanctions (Doc. 25 ). The motion is denied as to the requested $150 award and granted as to the requested dismissal of this lawsuit. This case is dismissed with prejudice based on Plaintiff's want of prosecution. Judgment shall be entered accordingly. Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan on 2/16/2018. (rah)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams. Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan on 5/13/2016. (tjk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
