Annamalai v. Laird et al
| Annamalai Annamalai |
| Paul M. Laird, Federal Bureau of Prisons and Maureen P. Baird |
| 3:2016cv00524 |
| May 12, 2016 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| David R. Herndon |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
23
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Order Dismissing Case (Doc. 15) and Order Denying Notice of Dismissal Without Prejudice (Doc. 21) are VACATED. Petitioner's Notice of Dismissal Without Prejudice is GRANTED. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice. See FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). The Clerk is hereby DIRECTED to STRIKE Petitioner's unsigned Motion to Withdraw (Doc. 22). Signed by Judge David R. Herndon on 6/23/2016. (tjk)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER DISMISSING CASE: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petition (Doc. 1) is summarily DISMISSED with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that on or before July 11, 2016, petitioner Annamalai shall SHOW CAUSE in writing why he should not be sanctioned fo r filing this frivolous, harassing action. If no response to the show cause order is received, or if the response is deemed insufficient, an order and final judgment will be entered. (Action due by 7/11/2016). Signed by Judge David R. Herndon on 6/9/2016. (tjk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
