Grant v. State of Illinois et al
| Reginald A Grant |
| State of Illinois, John R Baldwin, Craig Foster, Guy Pierce and Unknown Party |
| 3:2016cv00576 |
| May 24, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| Fayette |
| Michael J. Reagan |
| Stephen C. Williams |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
12
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams. Evidentiary Hearing set for 6/9/2016 01:30 PM in East St. Louis Courthouse before Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Mandato ry Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 3) is GRANTED IN PART, DENIED IN PART, in that Defendant CRAIG FOSTER, in his official capacity as warden of Vandalia Correctional Center, shall ensure that Plaintiff Reginald A. Grant is immediately assigned a mobility aid and/or assistant for purposes of navigating beyond the confines of his cell. The aid shall also perform and basic or incidental reading and writing tasks, and assist Plaintiff as generally discussed in this Order-all until such time as Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary hearing is resolved. No other injunctive relief is authorized at this time. Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan on 5/26/2016. (tjk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
