Watford v. Ellis et al
Plaintiff: Marlon L. Watford
Defendant: Officer Ellis, Brad Bramlet, Tonya Knust and Lacy Ream
Case Number: 3:2016cv00582
Filed: May 25, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
Office: East St. Louis Office
County: Randolph
Presiding Judge: Nancy J. Rosenstengel
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 83 ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Appeal in Forma Pauperis (Doc. 78 ) is DENIED. Watford shall tender the appellate filing and docketing fee of $505.00 to the Clerk of Court in this District within 30 days of the date of entry of this order. Alternatively, he may reapply for leave to appeal IFP directly with United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 2/11/2020. (mlp)
September 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 67 ORDER ADOPTING 65 Report and Recommendation and GRANTING 48 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Kellie Ellis, Brad Bramlett, Tonya Knust, and Lacy Reams. This action is DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to correct Defendants' names on the docket as reflected in footnote 1 and enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 9/16/2019. (mlp)
June 20, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER DENYING 26 Motion for Summary Judgment for Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies filed by Defendants. Signed by Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 6/20/2017. (mlp)
October 13, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson. Signed by Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 10/13/2016. (tjk)
May 25, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 1 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER severing case number 15-567-MJR. Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan on 5/25/2016. (tjk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Watford v. Ellis et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marlon L. Watford
Represented By: Lane Matthews
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Officer Ellis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brad Bramlet
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tonya Knust
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lacy Ream
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?