Davis et al v. Baldwin
| Henry Davis, Douglas Coleman, Aaron Fillmore, Jerome Jones, Deshawn Gardner and Percell Dansberry |
| John Baldwin |
| 3:2016cv00600 |
| June 2, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| Lawrence |
| Michael J. Reagan |
| Stephen C. Williams |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
230
CLASS CERTIFICATION ORDER: 173 Plaintiffs' Motion to Certify Class is GRANTED; 225 Defendant's Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Information & Authority is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; 227 Defendant's Motion For Lea ve to Submit Supplemental Authority is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to SUBSTITUTE Rob Jeffreys, in his official capacity, for John Baldwin as the Defendant in this case. The Clerk is further DIRECTED to strike certain documents and add not es to the docket, as set forth on pages 4 and 59 of the attached PDF Order. Plaintiffs shall submit the exhibits to their Complaint and Eldon Vail's expert report in accordance with the instructions on pages 3 and 59 of the attached PDF Order. This matter will be set for a status hearing by separate Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty on 6/14/21. (klh2)
|
|
Filing
71
ORDER denying 22 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, Lack of Jurisdiction. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams on 3/10/2017. (anj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
