Sangraal v. Doe
Plaintiff: Benjamin Sangraal
Defendant: John Doe
Case Number: 3:2016cv00747
Filed: July 6, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
Office: East St. Louis Office
County: Logan
Presiding Judge: Nancy J. Rosenstengel
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 16, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice, denying 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Benjamin Sangraal. Signed by Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 8/16/2016. (tjk)
July 6, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER severing case number 16-550-MJR. Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan on 7/6/2016. (tjk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sangraal v. Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Benjamin Sangraal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?