Walston v. Baldwin et al
Plaintiff: Timothy L. Walston
Defendant: John Baldwin, Kimberly S. Butler and C/O Benefield
Case Number: 3:2016cv00884
Filed: August 5, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
Office: East St. Louis Office
County: Randolph
Presiding Judge: Michael J. Reagan
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 220 ORDER OVERRULING 217 218 Objections filed by Plaintiff to 215 Bill of Costs filed by Defendant Benefield. The Court ORDERS an award of costs in the amount of $538.65 for Defendant Benefield. The Clerk of Court shall tax costs in this amount against Plaintiff. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty on 12/7/2022. (spl)
April 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 156 ORDER GRANTING 144 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by John Baldwin and Kimberly Butler. Plaintiff's claim against Defendants Baldwin and Butler is DISMISSED with prejudice and the Clerk is DIRECTED to terminate them from the docket. The case will proceed as to Defendant Benefield, consistent with the attached Memorandum and Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty on 4/30/2020. (spl)
March 15, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 105 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 79 and GRANTING 61 Motion for Summary Judgment for Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies filed by Wexford Health Sources, Dr. Trost, and Dr. Fuentes: For the reasons explained in the attac hed Order, the Court ADOPTS in full the R&R submitted by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams (Doc. 79) and GRANTS the Pavey-based summary judgment motion filed by Defendants Trost, Fuentes, and Wexford (Doc. 61). Plaintiff's clai ms against Defendants Trost, Fuentes, and Wexford are DISMISSED without prejudice, and the Clerk is DIRECTED to terminate them from the docket. The case will proceed as to Defendants Baldwin, Butler, and Benefield. See Order for details. Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan on 3/15/18. (soh)
November 9, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams. Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan on 11/9/2016. (tjk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Walston v. Baldwin et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Timothy L. Walston
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Baldwin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kimberly S. Butler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: C/O Benefield
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?