Williams v. Mount et al
| D'Aaron Williams |
| Capt. Mount, Jane Doe, John Doe, Lt. Haynes and Jane Doe 2 |
| 3:2016cv01265 |
| November 21, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| Jefferson |
| Michael J. Reagan |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
15
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, should he wish to proceed with this case, Plaintiff shall file his Second Amended Complaint, stating any facts which may e xist to support a medical indifference claim, within 28 days of the entry of this order (on or before May 17, 2017). Failure to file an amended complaint shall result in the dismissal of this action with prejudice. (Amended Pleadings due by 5/17/2017). Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 4/18/2017. (tjk)
|
|
Filing
6
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Amended Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, should he wish to proceed with this case, Plaintiff shall file his Second Amended Complaint, stating any facts which may exist to support a medical indifference claim, within 28 days of the entry of this order. (Amended Pleadings due by 1/26/2017). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan on 12/29/2016. (tjk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
