Mays v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
| Michael A. J. Mays |
| Illinois Department of Corrections and S. Evans |
| 3:2016cv01307 |
| December 5, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| Livingston |
| Staci M. Yandle |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
ORDER: the Motion for Summary Judgment on the Issue of Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies filed by Defendants Butler and Olson (Doc. 44 ) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Kimberly C. Butler are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Staci M. Yandle on 5/30/18. (bps)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 28 MOTION for Leave to File filed by Michael A. J. Mays; and FINDING AS MOOT 21 MOTION to Amend/Correct 1 Complaint filed by Michael A. J. Mays. The Clerk of Court is directed to file Plaintiff&# 039;s proposed second amended complaint as the First Amended Complaint. The Clerk of Court shall prepare for Defendants Officer Olson and Kimberly Butler: (1) Form 5 (Notice of a Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of Summons), and (2) Form 6 (Waiver of Service of Summons). Signed by Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly on 1/3/2018. (nmf)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly. Signed by Judge Staci M. Yandle on 1/4/2017. (tjk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
