Terrell v. Vandalia Correction Center
| Ronnie Terrell |
| Vandalia Correction Center |
| 3:2016cv01313 |
| December 7, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| Perry |
| Nancy J. Rosenstengel |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time (Doc. 25) is CONSTRUED as a NOTICE OF APPEAL from the Order and Judgment dismissing this action. The Clerk shall terminate the motion at Doc. 25 and take all necessary steps to transmit the record in this case to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. Signed by Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 2/7/2018. (tjk)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER DISMISSING CASE: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that COUNT 3, LASHBROOK, and BALDWIN, are DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Second Amended Complaint, as well as this entire action, are DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Further, because the Second Amended Complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, this dismissal shall count as one of Plaintiff's three allotted strikes within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Signed by Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 1/8/2018. (tjk)
|
|
Filing
15
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re 14 Amended Complaint filed by Ronnie Terrell. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that COUNTS 1 and 2 are DISMISSED with prejudice forfailure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that COUNT 3 is DIS MISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the First Amended Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice as to Count 3 and with prejudice as to Counts 1 and 2, for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, should he wish to proceed with this case, Plaintiff shall file a Second Amended Complaint, stating any facts which may exist to support a failure to protect claim, within 28 days of the entry of this order (on or before August 31, 2017). (Amended Pleadings due by 8/31/2017.) Plaintiff has filed a Motion for Attorney Representation (Doc. 4) and two Motions for Recruitment of Counsel (Docs. 11, 13). These Motions (Docs. 4, 11, 13) are DENIED. Signed by Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 8/3/2017. (jaj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Terrell v. Vandalia Correction Center | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Ronnie Terrell | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Vandalia Correction Center | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
