Holmes v. Construction Turnaround Services et al
Edward Holmes |
Construction Turnaround Services, Don Schexnider, Grant Dalton and Aaron May |
3:2016cv01338 |
December 12, 2016 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
East St. Louis Office |
Madison |
J. Phil Gilbert |
Donald G. Wilkerson |
Other Labor Litigation |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 48 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, The Court GRANTS Holmes' motion to remand (Doc. 24); REMANDS this case to the Circuit Court for the Third Judicial Circuit, Madison County, Illinois; and DENIES without prejudice as moot the following motions: defendants& #039; motions to dismiss for failure to state a claim (Docs. 14, 18 & 37). The defendants may refile these motions in state court with reference to the appropriate state court pleading standards; and CTS's motion for leave to file an amended notice of removal (Doc. 19). Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 6/29/2017. (jdh) |
Filing 47 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, The Court finds that Count IV is DISMISSED without prejudice and DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to enter judgment accordingly at the close of the case. May is terminated as a party to this case. This dismissal further renders MOOT May's motion to dismiss (Doc. 6 ) and motion to stay discovery (Doc. 41 ). Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 4/24/2017. (jdh) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.