Engel v. People

Engel v. People

Plaintiff:	Timothy Engel
Defendant:	People
Case Number:	3:2017cv00024
Filed:	January 11, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
Office:	East St. Louis Office
County:	Cook
Presiding Judge:	Michael J. Reagan
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 16, 2017	Filing 11 ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice for failure to comply with an order of this Court and failure to prosecute. Plaintiff's Amended Complaint is STRICKEN for failure to comply with Rule 11(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Because the Complaint (Doc. 1) was originally dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, this dismissal shall count as one of Plaintiff's three allotted strikes within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan on 5/16/2017. (tjk)
March 9, 2017	Filing 8 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that PEOPLE is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be gra nted.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, should he wish to proceed with this case, Plaintiff shall file his First Amended Complaint, stating any facts which may exist to support his Eighth Amendment claims, within 28 days of the entry of this order.(Amended Pleadings due by 4/6/2017). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan on 3/9/2017. (tjk)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 16, 2017

Filing 11 ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice for failure to comply with an order of this Court and failure to prosecute. Plaintiff's Amended Complaint is STRICKEN for failure to comply with Rule 11(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Because the Complaint (Doc. 1) was originally dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, this dismissal shall count as one of Plaintiff's three allotted strikes within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan on 5/16/2017. (tjk)

March 9, 2017

Filing 8 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that PEOPLE is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be gra nted.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, should he wish to proceed with this case, Plaintiff shall file his First Amended Complaint, stating any facts which may exist to support his Eighth Amendment claims, within 28 days of the entry of this order.(Amended Pleadings due by 4/6/2017). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan on 3/9/2017. (tjk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Engel v. People
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Timothy Engel
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: People
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?