Williams v. USA et al
| Shaun Williams |
| USA, Jeffrey S. Walton, Fernando Castillo, Lesley Duncan-Brooks, M. Bagwell, Randall Pass and Paul Harvey |
| 3:2017cv00153 |
| February 13, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| Williamson |
| Michael J. Reagan |
| Prison Condition |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
69
CLERK'S JUDGMENT. Approved by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 7/9/2019. (jdh)
|
|
Filing
49
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, The Court ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (Doc. 43 ) GRANTS defendants Bagwell's and Harvey's motion for summary judgment (Doc. 28 ), DENIES plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (Doc. 39 ), DENIES plaintiff's motion for an extension of time (Docs. 44 , 46 ), DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to terminate M. Bagwell and Paul Harvey as defendants in this case. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 3/2/2018. (jdh)
|
|
Filing
31
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, The Court REJECTS the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 22 ) in its entirety and reinstates Count 2 medical negligence under the Federal tort Claims Act against defendant United States of America. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 6/19/2017. (jdh)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 3/28/2017. (tjk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
