Hutcherson v. Talbot et al
| Lonnie Hutcherson |
| Dr. Shah, Dr. Butalid, Dr. Lochard and Warden of Lincoln Correctional Center |
| 3:2017cv00253 |
| March 13, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| Logan |
| Reona J. Daly |
| J. Phil Gilbert |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
106
ORDER: Magistrate Judge Daly's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 96 ) is ADOPTED in its entirety. Accordingly, Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment (Docs. 87 & 89 ) are GRANTED and Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED with prejudice. Defendants' Motion to Strike the Reply (Doc. 101 ) is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment accordingly and to close the case. Signed by Judge Staci M. Yandle on 3/16/2020. (bps)
|
|
Filing
72
ORDER denying 66 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge David R. Herndon on 12/26/2017. (lmp)
|
|
Filing
61
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, The Court ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (Doc. 51 ) and DENIES Hutcherson's motion for a preliminary injunction. (Doc. 6 ). Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 10/11/2017. (jdh)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER denying 3 Motion to Appoint Counsel; denying 35 Motion for Subpoenas; denying 24 Motion for Subpoenas. Signed by Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly on 8/1/2017. (dam)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
