Brown v. Baldwin et al
Kenneth Brown |
John Baldwin, Sherry Benton, Sandra Funk and State of Illinois |
3:2017cv00298 |
March 21, 2017 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
East St. Louis Office |
Johnson |
Michael J. Reagan |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. All pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. Plaintiff is ADVISED that this dismissal shall count as one of his three allotted strikes under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan on 5/16/2017. (tjk) |
Filing 16 MERIT REVIEW OPINION #2 denying 3 Motion to Request Counsel; granting 8 Motion for Leave to File. Clerk to docket the amended complaint attached to Plaintiff's Motion 8 . Plaintiff's complaint as it related to his claims against off icials at Taylorville Correctional Center is dismissed for failure to state a claim. Clerk is directed to terminate Defendants Skinner, Berninger, and Hardway. This case is transferred to the Southern District of Illinois to address Plaintiff's remaining claims. Any motions not addressed in the Order shall be addressed by the transferee court. Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 03/20/2017. (SKN, ilcd) [Transferred from Illinois Central on 3/21/2017.] |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.