Veath Fish Farm, LLC v. Purina Animal Nutrition, LLC et al
| Veath Fish Farm, LLC |
| Purina Animal Nutrition, LLC and Texas Farm Products Company |
| 3:2017cv00303 |
| March 22, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| Randolph |
| Michael J. Reagan |
| Stephen C. Williams |
| Property Damage Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
123
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The Court ADOPTS in its entirety the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 117 ). The Court finds that Magistrate Judge Williams's recommendations are sound, particularly in light of the detailed anal ysis of TFPs prior conduct in settlement of this case as well as the detailed sanction fee calculation. Accordingly, TFP must tender $3,495.00 to Plaintiff Veath for its sanctioned conduct. Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan on 3/27/2019. (rah)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum and Order, the Court finds the Plaintiff has set forth sufficiently detailed information in the Complaint to warrant proceeding beyond dismissal on seven of the nine counts-Counts I, II, III, V, VI, VII, and IX. Accordingly, the Motions to Dismiss (Docs. 27 and 31 ) are DENIED in part as to these counts, and are GRANTED in part as to Counts IV and VIII. Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan on 10/6/2017. (rah)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
