Wadlington v. Werlich
| Euka Wadlington |
| T. G. Werlich |
| 3:2017cv00449 |
| May 1, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| Bond |
| David R. Herndon |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
61
ORDER GRANTING Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. The following relief is ORDERED: The career-offender-enhanced life sentences for Count 1 and Count 7 imposed upon Euka Wadlington by the United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa in United States v. Wadlington, Case No. 98-cr-242 are VACATED. Wadlington's sentence of incarceration in United States v. Wadlington, Case No. 98-cr-242 (S.D. Iowa) is REDUCED to 240 months on Count 1 and 240 months on Count 7, to be served co ncurrently. Wadlington's term of supervised release is REDUCED to 3 years on each Count, to be served concurrently. In all other respects, the Judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa entered on August 5, 1999 remains in effect. Euka Wadlington, BOP No. 10296-424, shall be IMMEDIATELY RELEASED from the custody of the Bureau of Prisons, subject to the terms and conditions of supervised release ordered by the Southern District of Iowa in Case No. 98-cr -242. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment in favor of Wadlington. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to furnish certified copies of this Order to the Bureau of Prisons, the Warden of FCI-Greenville, Illinois, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of Iowa, the Federal Public Defender for the Southern District of Iowa, and the Clerk of the District court for the Southern District of Iowa for filing in Case No. 98-cr-242. Signed by Judge Staci M. Yandle on 4/7/2020. (beb)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER: Petitioner's Motion to File Amended Petition (Doc. 31) is GRANTED. The Clerk is DIRECTED to file the Amended Habeas Petition in CM/ECF. The Government may respond to any arguments or authority cited therein on or before 30 days from the e ntry of this order. By the same deadline, the Government shall address what impact, if any, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals' recent decision in United States v. Elder. IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Withdraw as Counsel is GRANTED, and the Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Doc. 33) is DENIED without prejudice at this time. Signed by Judge David R. Herndon on 9/25/2018. (tjk)
|
|
Filing
4
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Clifford J. Proud. Signed by Judge David R. Herndon on 7/17/2017. (jaj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Wadlington v. Werlich | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Euka Wadlington | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: T. G. Werlich | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
